Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.24 seconds)Section 8 in Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950
Section 16 in Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 48 in Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Fruit And Vegetable Merchants Union vs Delhi Improvement Trust on 6 November, 1956
7. The contention undoubtedly appears to be sound as far as the legal status of the Custodian with regard to evacuee property vesting in him is concerned. As pointed out in Fruit and Vegetable Merchants Union v. The Delhi Improvement Trust, AIR 1957 SC 344;
Section 7 in Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
The Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920
Amar Singh vs Custodian, Evacuee Property, Punjab on 29 March, 1957
On the one hand we have vesting under the Land Acquisition Act, whereby property acquired 'vests absolutely in the Government" and thereby becomes the property of the Government without any limitation either as to title or as to possession; while on the other hand property which 'vests in the receiver "under the Provincial Insolvency Act vests only for the purpose of administering the estate and paying the debts of the insolvent and the receiver has no interest of his own in such property. The vesting which takes place in the case of evacuee property appears to approximate rather to the latter type. As pointed out by the Supreme Court in Amar Singh v. Custodian E. P. Punjab, AIR 1957 SC 599 :