Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.23 seconds)Section 28 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Indu Engineering & Textiles Ltd vs Delhi Development Authority on 11 July, 2001
11. The said judgment of the High Court is challenged in this
appeal. Having accepted the decision of the trial court and paid
the amount due as per the said decision, the only ground urged
in this appeal is that for calculating the price escalation, the
difference should be with reference to base price of the washery
coal used and not with reference to base price of a lower quality
of washery coal.
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd vs Saw Pipes Ltd on 17 April, 2003
13. The High Court did not have the benefit of the principles
laid down in Saw Pipes (supra), and had proceeded on the
assumption that award cannot be interfered, even if it was
contrary to the terms of the contract. It went to the extent of
holding that contract terms cannot even be looked into for
examining the correctness of the award.
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
Section 24 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 37 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Konkan Railway Corpn. Ltd. & Ors vs M/S. Mehul Construction Co on 21 August, 2000
Reliance was placed by the High Court on the decisions of this
Court in Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. v. Mehul
Construction Co. [AIR 2000 SC 2821], P.V. Subba Naidu v.
Government of Andhra Pradesh [1998 (9) SCC 407] and Indu
Engineering & Textiles Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority
[2001 (5) SCC 691].