Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.27 seconds)
Pullagura Guru Swami vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 16 March, 2020 cites

Jagpal Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 28 January, 2011

9. After the judgment in Jagpal Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others (1st referred supra), the State of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O.Ms.No.188 dated 21.07.2011 framing guidelines for eviction of unauthorized encroachers. Hence, respondents are bound to take action against unauthorized encroachers following 1 (2011) 11 SCC 396 2 2004 (8) SCC 733 4 G.O.Ms.No.188 dated 21.07.2011 and cannot assign land to landless poor, in view of bar under BSO 15 (4)(m) of A.P Revenue Board Standing Orders and in view of principle laid down in the above judgments.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 964 - M Katju - Full Document

Friends Colony Development Committee vs State Of Orissa & Ors on 1 November, 2004

8. Even assuming for a moment that the petitioner is not in possession, since the land is classified as "grazing ground", identification of the same for the purpose of assigning to landless poor under the scheme "Navaratnalu-Pedalandariki Illu" is contrary to clause (m) of para No.4 of BSO 15 of A.P Revenue Board Standing Orders, since "grazing ground" is a communal land for grazing cattle of a particular area, such communal land cannot be assigned. Apart from that when land is communal land, it is the duty of State to protect such communal lands, in view of judgment in Jagpal Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others1 where the Supreme Court held that interest of community has to be protected and reiterated the principle laid down in the earlier judgment in Friends Colony Development Committee vs. State of Orissa2.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 318 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1