Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.27 seconds)M/S. Fair Air Engineers Pvt. Ltd.& Anr vs N.K.Modi on 20 August, 1996
The mere fact that the other
remedy of resorting to the arbitration proceedings, as per agreement annexure
R4, has been availed of by the OPs, that would not oust the jurisdiction of the
Consumer Fora, in view of Section 3 of the Act. Similar principle of law was laid down in Fair Engg. Pvt. Ltd. & another Vs
N.K.Modi (2003)2 SCC412 and C.C.I
Chambers Coop. Housing Society Ltd. Vs Development Credit Bank Ltd. (2006)3
SCC721. The submission of the Counsel for the Parsvnath Developers Ltd.
appellants, in appeal NO.46 of 2011, being devoid of merit is rejected.
Cci Chambers Co-Op. Hsg. Society Ltd vs Development Credit Bank Ltd on 29 August, 2003
The mere fact that the other
remedy of resorting to the arbitration proceedings, as per agreement annexure
R4, has been availed of by the OPs, that would not oust the jurisdiction of the
Consumer Fora, in view of Section 3 of the Act. Similar principle of law was laid down in Fair Engg. Pvt. Ltd. & another Vs
N.K.Modi (2003)2 SCC412 and C.C.I
Chambers Coop. Housing Society Ltd. Vs Development Credit Bank Ltd. (2006)3
SCC721. The submission of the Counsel for the Parsvnath Developers Ltd.
appellants, in appeal NO.46 of 2011, being devoid of merit is rejected.
Section 12 in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 [Entire Act]
The Consumer Protection Act, 1986
1