Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 122 (0.58 seconds)Section 13 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 38 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 25 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
K. Veeraswamy Deceased By L.R.K.B. ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Andhra ... on 10 December, 1959
““Officer subordinate.”— What is the exact purport of the
component words of the expression “any officer
subordinate” used in the Sec.44-A of the Motor Vehicles
Act, 1939. “Any” is a word which excludes limitation
or qualification. It connotes wide generality. Its use
points to a distributive construction. The word “any”
is used in the sense of “any body”, “any person”. The
individual who is invested with the authority and is
required to perform the duties incidental to an office is an
officer. For determining whether officers are
subordinate or not the test is not whether a review of
such of their determinations as are quasi-judicial may
be had, but whether in the performance of their various
duties they are subject to the direction and control of
a superior officer, or are independent officers subject
only to such directions as the statute gives.— B.
Veeraswamy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1959) Andh.
W.R.308 at p.314: A.I.R. 1959 A.P. 413 (F.B.)”
(emphasis supplied)