Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.37 seconds)Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 304B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Sunil Clifford Daniel vs State Of Punjab on 14 September, 2012
The Supreme Court in Sunil Clifford Daniel Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 11 SCC 205, has held that it is obligatory on the part of accused while being examined under Section 313 Cr.P.C. to furnish some explanation with respect to incriminating circumstances associated with him. The court must take note of such explanation even in a case of circumstantial evidence to decide as to whether or not chain of circumstances is complete. When attention of accused is drawn to such circumstances that inculpate him in relation to commission of crime and he fails to offer an appropriate explanation or gives a false answer with respect to same, the said act may be counted as providing a missing link for completing chain of circumstances.
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
1