Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.16 seconds)
Prem Chand vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi Through Chief ... on 6 December, 2010 cites

Roop Singh Negi vs Punjab National Bank & Ors on 19 December, 2008

4. In our considered view, appellate authority while acting as a quasi-judicial authority is not to dispose of the appeal on its ipsi dixit but deal with the contentions and pass a reasoned order. Applicant right from the beginning has taken a stand of his non-involvement in the episode and has not committed any misconduct. The above aspect and the testimony of PWs 1 and 6 having not been considered at all, the other grounds raised by the applicant, though the penalty on compassionate grounds was reduced, yet in view of the decision of the Apex Court in Roop Singh Negi v. Punjab National Bank & others, 2009 (1) SCALE 286 as well as in G. Vallikumari v. Andhra Education Society & others, (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 406 the order passed in the present form is not maintainable.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 1059 - S B Sinha - Full Document

G. Vallikumari vs Andhra Education Society & Ors on 2 February, 2010

4. In our considered view, appellate authority while acting as a quasi-judicial authority is not to dispose of the appeal on its ipsi dixit but deal with the contentions and pass a reasoned order. Applicant right from the beginning has taken a stand of his non-involvement in the episode and has not committed any misconduct. The above aspect and the testimony of PWs 1 and 6 having not been considered at all, the other grounds raised by the applicant, though the penalty on compassionate grounds was reduced, yet in view of the decision of the Apex Court in Roop Singh Negi v. Punjab National Bank & others, 2009 (1) SCALE 286 as well as in G. Vallikumari v. Andhra Education Society & others, (2010) 1 SCC (L&S) 406 the order passed in the present form is not maintainable.
Supreme Court of India Cites 35 - Cited by 151 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

Shri Ramesh Chand Yadav vs Secretary (Labour), Govt. Of Nct Of ... on 12 May, 2009

Learned counsel would also contend that in an identical situation in Ramesh Chand v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr., OA No.525/2009, decided on 09.09.2009 a similar view has been taken by the Tribunal, which exonerates applicant from any charge, as he has discharged his duties efficiently and it was the responsibility of others to discharge their duties efficiently and diligently, which resulted in escape of a dreaded criminal.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - V K Shali - Full Document
1