Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.22 seconds)

P. Chidambaram vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 5 September, 2019

8. Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that the bail is the rule and the jail is the exception. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chidambaram. P v Directorate of Enforcement [2019 (16) SCALE 870], after considering all the earlier judgments, observed that, the basic jurisprudence relating to bail remains the same inasmuch as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the 2025:KER:29602 B.A.Nos. 4672 of 2025 and Connected Cases 163 exception so as to ensure that the accused has the opportunity of securing fair trial.
Supreme Court of India Cites 78 - Cited by 2721 - R Banumathi - Full Document

Joginder Kumar vs State Of U.P on 25 April, 1994

"12. We may note that personal liberty is an important aspect of our constitutional mandate. The occasion to arrest an accused during investigation arises when custodial investigation becomes necessary or it is a heinous crime or where there is a possibility of influencing the witnesses or accused may abscond. Merely because an arrest can be made because it is lawful does not mandate that arrest must be made. A distinction must be made between the existence of the power to arrest and the justification for exercise of it. (Joginder Kumar v. State of UP and Others (1994 KHC 189: (1994) 4 SCC 260:
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 5745 - S Mohan - Full Document
1