Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (1.55 seconds)

Prabhu Dayal vs The State Of Rajasthan on 4 July, 2018

19. The Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Ramesh Kumar vs. State of Chattiness, reported in AIR 2001 SC 383 referred in Prabhu vs. The State represented by the Inspector of Police and anr supra, relied upon by learned counsel for the applicant, in para No.20 has examined different meaning of 'instigation', which reads as, 'instigation' is to goad, urge forward, provoke, incite or encourage to do "an act". To satisfy the requirement of instigation though it is not necessary that actual words must be used to that effect or what constitutes instigation must necessarily and specifically be suggestive of the consequence. Yet a reasonable certainty to incite the consequence must be capable of being spelt out. The present one is not a case where the accused had by his acts or omission or by a continued course of conduct created such circumstances that the deceased .....23/-
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 44 - M M Shantanagoudar - Full Document

Geeta I. Koulagi vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 February, 2019

20. This aspect is also considered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the recent judgment in the case of Geeta vs. State of Karnataka supra wherein also it is held that, "to satisfy the requirement of instigation, the accused by his acts or omission or by a continued course of conduct should create such circumstances that the deceased was left with no other option except to commit suicide."
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pradeep Kumar Kesarwani vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 7 January, 2022

21. The similar observations are made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Pradeep Kumar Kesarwani vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and anr, reported in 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 880 wherein by referring catena of decisions, it is held that, "the following steps should ordinarily determine the veracity of a prayer for quashing, raised by an accused by invoking the power vested in the High Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.: --
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramesh Kumar Soni vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 February, 2013

19. The Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Ramesh Kumar vs. State of Chattiness, reported in AIR 2001 SC 383 referred in Prabhu vs. The State represented by the Inspector of Police and anr supra, relied upon by learned counsel for the applicant, in para No.20 has examined different meaning of 'instigation', which reads as, 'instigation' is to goad, urge forward, provoke, incite or encourage to do "an act". To satisfy the requirement of instigation though it is not necessary that actual words must be used to that effect or what constitutes instigation must necessarily and specifically be suggestive of the consequence. Yet a reasonable certainty to incite the consequence must be capable of being spelt out. The present one is not a case where the accused had by his acts or omission or by a continued course of conduct created such circumstances that the deceased .....23/-
Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 497 - T S Thakur - Full Document
1   2 Next