Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.29 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 19 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 124 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Abhishek Mundhra vs The Additional Director General on 26 November, 2014
The Court distinguished the decisions in Oryx Fisheries Pvt. Ltd., (cited supra) and Siemens Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2007 (207) E.L.T. 168 (SC) as done in Abhishek Mudhra (supra) and refused to entertain the challenge to a show cause notice.
The Customs Act, 1962
Commr.Of Customs vs M/S K.M.Ganatra & Co. on 14 January, 2016
14. Further, the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature and as observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs Vs. K.M.Ganatra & Co. reported in 2016 (332) E.L.T. 15 (SC), the role of a Custom House Agent is very important in the Custom House and the Custom House Agent is supposed to safeguard the interests of both the importers and the Customs, and this aspect will be considered, when the show cause notice is adjudicated.
Oryx Fisheries Pvt.Ltd vs Union Of India & Ors on 29 October, 2010
After referring to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Oryx Fisheries Private Limited Vs. Union of India reported in 2011 (266) E.L.T. 422 (SC), held that the use of the words it appears that is indicative of prima facie opinion and final determination.
M/S Rr Financial Consultants Ltd vs Union Of India And Ors on 19 September, 2013
However, the Hon'ble Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in the case of R.R.Financial Consultants Ltd. Vs. Union of India reported in 2014 (33) S.T.R. 12 (Del.), considered what would amount to pre-judging and pre-deciding an issue by an authority at the time when show cause notice is issued.