Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (1.42 seconds)Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Nelson Fernandes And Ors vs Special Land Acquisition ... on 2 March, 2007
15. Further, in Nelson Fernades vs. Special Land
Acquisition Officer 2007(9) SCC 447 while dealing with the
case where the land was acquired for laying a Railway line,
the Court held that no deduction by way of development
charges was permissible as there was no question of any
development thereof.
Atma Singh (Died) Through Lrs. & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 7 December, 2007
condition, situation, user to which it is put or is reasonably
capable of being put and proximity to residential,
commercial or industrial areas or institutions. The existing
amenities like, water, electricity, possibility of their further
of
extension, whether near about Town is developing or has
prospect ofrt development have to be taken into
consideration. (Atma Singh and others v. State of Haryana
and another (2008) 2 SCC 568).
Smt. Shakuntalabai & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra on 23 November, 1995
19. If there is evidence or admission on behalf of the
claimants as to the market value commanded by the
acquired land itself, the need to travel beyond the boundary
of the acquired land is obviated. Instances of sale in respect
of the similar land situated in the same village and/or
neighbouring villages could be taken to be a guiding factors
::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 20:00:29 :::HCHP
14
for determination of market value. {Shakuntalabai (Smt.) &
Ors. v. State of Maharashtra (1996) 2 SCC 152, ONGC
.
G.M., O.N.G.C. Ltd vs Sendhabhai Vastram Patel & Ors on 8 August, 2005
Limited v. Sendhabhai Vastram Patel & Ors. (2005) 6 SCC
454}.
Union Of India vs Pramod Gupta (D) By Lrs. & Ors on 7 September, 2005
The Land Acquisition Officer, ... vs Nookala Rajamallu And Ors. on 21 November, 2003
In Land Acquisition Officer, Kammarapally
village, Nizamabad District, A. P. v. Nookala Rajamallu &
Ors. [(2003) 12 SCC 334 (para 9)], the Apex Court observed:
Suresh Kumar vs Town Improvement Trust, Bhopal on 3 March, 1989
In Suresh Kumar v. Town Improvement Trust,
Bhopal [(1989) 2 SCC 329], the Apex Court has held that
while determining the market value of the land acquired, it
of
has to be correctly determined and paid so that there is
neither unjust enrichment on the part of the acquirer nor
rt
undue deprivation on the part of the owner.
Delhi Development Authority vs Bali Ram Sharma And Ors. on 3 August, 2004
In Delhi Development Authority v. Bali Ram
Sharma & Ors. [(2004) 6 SCC 533], it is held that in cases
where the purpose of acquisition was the same but the
notification under Section 4(1) was issued on a subsequent
date, obviously there would be escalation of prices in regard
to those lands.