Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.33 seconds)The National Highways Act, 1956
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 3 in The National Highways Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 102 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 3D in The National Highways Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
State Of Maharashtra vs Tapas D. Neogy on 16 September, 1999
In the light of the principle laid down by the Apex
Court in State of Maharashtra v. Tapas D. Neogy's case
(supra), the police officer concerned would definitely have
the power to order 'seizure' of the bank account of an
accused or of his relatives, as the same is 'property' within
the meaning of section 102 of the Code. It is to be noted
that seizure and production in Court of any property will
Page 16 of 19
Downloaded on : Sun Feb 21 13:12:06 IST 2021
R/SCR.A/2409/2020 JUDGMENT
have a two-fold effect. Seizure may be necessary in order to
preserve the property, for the purpose of enabling the Court,
to pass suitable orders under section 452 or 453 of the
Code, as the case may be, at the conclusion of trial; and
production of the property may be necessary as evidence of
the commission of the crime. This two-fold object of
investing the police with the powers of seizure, have to be
borne in mind while setting this legal issue.
Section 3G in The National Highways Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Paresha G. Shah vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 15 June, 2015
In a decision of this Court rendered in the case of
Paresha G. Shah v. State of Gujarat passed in Special
Criminal Application No.150 of 2015 decided on
15.06.2015, it has been observed as under;