Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.45 seconds)
Smt.Shaik Asrifoon 2 Ors vs Guddanti Vijaya Krishna Anr on 7 March, 2025 cites

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Mohd. Nasir & Anr on 12 May, 2009

In Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., vs. Siby George10, this conflict of decisions was noticed and it was held that later two decisions i.e. National Insurance Company Ltd., vs. Mubasir Ahmed and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., vs. Mohd. Nasir & Another (referred supra), do not lay down correct law and upheld the grant of interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of accident.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 349 - S B Sinha - Full Document

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Sudini Indira And Ors. on 4 April, 2003

16. To start with, the Judgment relied upon by the Commissioner i.e. United India Insurance Company vs. Sudini Indira and Others is slightly different in the fact situation. In that case, there was an altercation between two drivers of the same employer after they had parked their vehicles and a case of a pre-existing dispute among them. In this case, the altercation is on account of rash and negligent driving caused by the driver of the tractor and the accident occurred while the driver drove the vehicle in an attempt to give way to the bus. The deceased himself was the complainant and on the 9 basis of his statement, F.I.R was registered against the driver of the tractor. The Section of law was altered subsequently in view of the death of the deceased.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 17 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Ã ... vs Mubasir Ahmed & Anr. Ã .Respondents on 1 February, 2007

In Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., vs. Siby George10, this conflict of decisions was noticed and it was held that later two decisions i.e. National Insurance Company Ltd., vs. Mubasir Ahmed and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., vs. Mohd. Nasir & Another (referred supra), do not lay down correct law and upheld the grant of interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of accident.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 293 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Mst. Abida Khatun vs General Manager, Diesel Locomotive on 15 May, 1972

In Abida Khatoon (Mst.,) vs. General Manager, Diesel Locomotive Works, Varanasi2, the Allahabad High Court while considering the above mentioned phrase referred to Judgment in Dover Navington Co.Ltd. Vs Grage3 explaining the fine distinction between "out of employment" and "in the course of employment" at Paragraph 63 which in the opinion of this Court is precise and the Paragraph 63 reads as follows;
Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Pratap Narain Singh Deo vs Srinivas Sabata And Anr on 4 December, 1975

26. Interest: The grant of interest as per Section 4-A (3) is from the date of compensation under the Act has "become due" and the controversy was when the compensation amount can be said to "become due" i.e. from the date of accident or from the date of adjudication. A four Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Pratap Narain Singh Deo vs. Srinivas Sabata and Another6 held that employer is responsible to pay compensation as soon as personal injury is caused to workman and the date of accident is the date on which amount is due and not date of adjudication by the Commissioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 944 - P N Shinghal - Full Document

Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs Siby George & Ors on 31 July, 2012

In Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., vs. Siby George10, this conflict of decisions was noticed and it was held that later two decisions i.e. National Insurance Company Ltd., vs. Mubasir Ahmed and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., vs. Mohd. Nasir & Another (referred supra), do not lay down correct law and upheld the grant of interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of accident.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 647 - A Alam - Full Document
1   2 Next