Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.67 seconds)Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 173 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Archit Saini vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. on 9 February, 2018
10.Referring the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Archit
Saini & Anr. v. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited & others, the
counsel would submit that the Tribunal has acted like a criminal Court.
When prima facie evidence of the occurrence has been established through
oral and teltale evidence, the Tribunal erroneously rejected the claim in toto
contrary to settled principle of law.
Kusum Lata And Others vs Satbir And Others on 21 May, 2010
Referring the judgment of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Kusum Lata v. Satbir reported in [2011(2) RCR(C)
379(SC)] , the counsel would submit that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has
held that “in a case relating to motor accident claims, the claimants are not
8/22
http://www.judis.nic.in
C.M.A.Nos.803 & 804 of 2016
required to rove the case as it is required to be done in a criminal trial. The
Court must keep this distinction in mind. Strict proof of an accident caused
by a particular bus in a particular manner may not be possible to be done
by the claimants”.
1