Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 35 (0.24 seconds)
M.D.Air Deccan vs Shri Ram Gopal Agarwal on 7 December, 2013 cites

Lucknow Development Authority vs M.K. Gupta on 5 November, 1993

Further, it would be appropriate to recall here the mandate of the Honble Supreme Court contained in Lucknow Development Authority v. M.K. Gupta (AIR 1994 SC 787) where is said The provisions of the Act thus have to be construed in favour of the consumer to achieve the purpose of enactment as it is a social benefit oriented legislation. The primary duty of the court while construing the provisions of such an Act is to adopt a constructive approach subject to that it should not do violence to the language of the provisions and is not contrary to the attempted objective of the enactment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 1040 - R M Sahai - Full Document

State (Through Cbi/New Delhi) vs S.J. Choudhary on 13 February, 1996

6.    SIL Imports, USA vs M/s Exim Aides Silk Exporters. (AIR 1999 SC 1609) (Hon'ble Supreme Court) This judgment emphasized that Courts have the duty to use interpretative process to the fullest extent permissible by an enactment by giving allowances for any relevant changes that have occurred since the Acts passing, in law, social conditions, technology etc. It referred to its earlier judgment State vs S.J. Choudhary (AIR 1996 SC 1491) which we shall quote in detail later.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 29 - J S Verma - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next