Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.34 seconds)
Govt. Of Manipur vs State Of Punjab And Another on 10 July, 1996 cites

H. Anraj And Others Etc vs State Of Maharashtra on 23 January, 1984

There is no dispute on the interpretation of either the entry in the Constitution or on any other Statute in view of the clear pronouncement of the Supreme Court of India in H. Anraj case (AIR 1984 SC 781) (supra) and M/s. suman Enterprises case (1994 (4) SCC 217) (supra). It has authoritatively been held that the Lotteries organised by the Government of India or the Government of a State has been made a subject within the exclusive legislative competence of the Parliament and, therefore, no Legislature of a State can make a law touching 'Lotteries organised by the Government of India or the Government of a State' and that a State Legislature can exercise powers for the regulation and control of the State 'Authorised' lotteries within its State. The controversy is to be determined on facts and on the interpretation put on the agreements entered by the petitioner with its sole selling agents, copy of which is Annexure P-2.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 42 - O C Reddy - Full Document

J. K. Bharati vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 23 July, 1984

18. Legal position that if the State Lotteries are held to be State 'organised' then the respondent-State has no legislative/executive authority to act with regard to those lotteries is admitted. The case of the petitioner is that the lotteries run by it are State 'organised' lotteries whereas the case of the respondent is that the lotteries run by the petitioner are State 'authorised' lotteries. Question 'as to whether the lotteries run by the petitioner are State 'orgainsed' or 'authorised' by the State' is to be examined in the light of entry No. 40 in List I of VIIth Schedule and Entry 34, List II, VIIth of Schedule as interpreted by their Lordships in H. Anraj's case (AIR 1984 SC 781) (supra) and J.K. Bharati's case (AIR 1984 SC 1542) (supra) and spelt out by the Apex Court in M/s. Suman Enterprises's case (1994 (4) SCC 217) (supra), in the given facts and circumstances of the case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 17 - O C Reddy - Full Document
1   2 Next