State Of Punjab vs Vk Khanna & Ors on 30 November, 2000
In State of Punjab v. V.K. Khanna and Ors. AIR 2001 SC 343, the Apex
Court held:-
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 40 (0.53 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 12 in Delhi Lokayukta and Upalokayukta Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
L. Chandra Kumar vs Union Of India And Others on 18 March, 1997
In L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Ors., (supra), it
was observed that the judicial review is a basic feature of the constitution
of India and even by making a provision in the Constitution, such a power
cannot be taken away.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Bank Of Patiala & Ors vs S.K.Sharma on 27 March, 1996
"11. The concept of principles of natural
justice has undergone a radical change. It is
not in every case, that the High Courts
would entertain a writ application only on
the ground that violation of principles of
natural justice has been alleged. The apex
court, in State Bank of Patiala and Ors. v.
S.K. Sharma
has clearly held that a person complaining
about the violation of the principles of
natural justice must show causation of a
prejudice against him by reason of such
violation. The apex court has held that the
principles of natural justice, may be said to
have been violated which require an
intervention when not hearing, no
opportunity or no notice has been given.
Mrs. Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 25 January, 1978
47. It is true that in Mrs. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and
Anr., (supra), the Apex Court laid down that the principles of natural
justice have to be complied with in the event, the person concerned suffers
civil or evil consequences, but the said rule would be applied subject to the
'Prejudice Doctrine'.
Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd vs Girja Shankar Pant & Ors on 18 October, 2000
Rattan Lal
Sharma's case (supra) thus, in fact, has not
expressed any opinion which runs counter to
that in Girja Shankar's case (2000 AIR SCW
3826) (supra) and the decision in the last
noted case thus follows the earlier judgment
in Rattan Lal's case even
though not specifically noticed therein.
Amar Nath Chowdhury vs Braithwaite And Company Ltd. & Ors on 11 January, 2002
He, in this connection, relied upon Amar Nath Chowdhary
v. Braithwaite and Company Ltd. & Ors. (supra).
Tarlochan Dev Sharma vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 25 July, 2001
In Tarlochan Dev Sharma v. State of Punjab and Ors., upon which Mr. Safaya has placed strong reliance, it is
observed: