Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 40 (0.33 seconds)
M/S Shrem Resorts Pvt Ltd vs Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority on 17 August, 2020 cites

Piedade Filomena Gonsalves vs State Of Goa And Ors on 11 March, 2004

28. Further, the directions given by the High Court in directing demolition of illegal construction effected during the currency of the 1991 and 2011 CRZ notifications are perfectly in tune with the decision of this Court in Piedade Filomena Gonsalves v. State of Goa, wherein this Court has held that such notifications have been issued in the interest of protecting environment and ecology in the coastal area and the construction raised in violation of such regulations cannot be lightly condoned.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 31 - Full Document

Sabia Khan And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 30 July, 1998

In M/s. Tilokchand Motichand & Ors. Vs. H.B. Munshi & Anr., AIR 1970 SC 898; State of Haryana Vs. Karnal 6 Distillery, AIR 1977 SC 781; and Sabia Khan & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors., (1999) 1 SCC 271, the Hon'ble Apex Court held that filing totally misconceived petition amounts to abuse of the process of the Court and such a litigant is not required to be dealt with lightly, as petition containing misleading and inaccurate statement, if filed, to achieve an ulterior purpose amounts to abuse of the process of the Court."
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 72 - Full Document

Abdul Rahman vs Prasony Bai & Anr on 20 November, 2002

In Abdul Rahman Vs. Prasony Bai & Anr., AIR 2003 SC 718; and S.J.S. Business Enterprises (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors., (2004) 7 SCC 166, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that whenever the Court comes to the conclusion that the process of the Court is being abused, the Court would be justified in refusing to proceed further and refuse relief to the party. This rule has been evolved out of need of the Courts to deter a litigant from abusing the process of the Court by deceiving it. However, the suppressed fact must be material one in the sense that had it not been suppressed, it would have led any fact on the on the merit of the case."
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 102 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next