Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.30 seconds)The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section 12 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970
Hussainbhai, Calicut vs Alath Factory Thozhilali ... on 28 July, 1978
In Hussainbhai, Calicut Vs. Alath Factory Thozhilali Union, Calicut and
Ors. AIR 1978 SC 1410 it was held that the presence of intermediate
contractors with whom alone the workers have immediate or direct
relationship ex contractu is of no consequence, when on lifting the veil or
looking at the conspectus of factors governing the employment, the naked
truth can be discerned though draped in perfect paper arrangement, that the
real employer is the management and not the immediate contractor. On the
basis of evidence the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the Respondent/
workmen had proved that they were working for the Petitioner through M/s.
Sparkling Enterprises @ 10% commission on the minimum wages and the
Petitioner keeps on changing the contractors. The control of economic
activities is in the hand of the Petitioner, though it was not directly paying
the salary to the workmen except for a limited period of May, 2000 to July,
2000. The grievance of the Petitioner with regard to the decision on the
issue No.2 is also unfounded in view of the fact that the Trial Court lifted the
veil and came to the conclusion that the contract was a mere camouflage and
the Petitioner was the principal employer.