Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.11 seconds)

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

Annual Income of the deceased Rs.99,000.00 (Rs.275/-x30x12) Add 40% of Rs.99,000/- as future prospects Rs.39,600.00 Yearly income of the deceased Rs.1,38,600.00 Less 1/2 of Rs.1,38,600.00 Rs.69,300.00 [deducted from the said amount as expenses that the victim would have incurred towards maintenance had he been alive.] Net yearly income Rs.69,300.00 Multiplier of '17' adopted in terms of Sarla Verma's case (Rs.69,300 x 17) Rs.11,78,100.00 Add Loss of Filial Consortium [Rs.40,000/- Rs.1,60,000.00 each, payable to Respondents No. 1 to 4, respectively] Add Funeral expenses Rs.15,000.00 Add Loss of estate Rs.15,000.00 Add Litigation costs Rs.25,000.00 Total Rs.13,93,100.00 (Rupees thirteen lakhs, ninety three thousand and one hundred) only.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram on 18 September, 2018

Hence, on the anvil of the aforestated ratio in Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. (supra) and Rajesh and Ors. (supra) the Respondents No.1 to 4 are entitled to Filial compensation. In my considered opinion, there is no requirement for computing loss of love and affection in the Award in view of compensation granted by way of Filial Consortium.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 4992 - I Malhotra - Full Document
1