Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 73 (0.38 seconds)Section 11 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
42. To understand the test of perversity, it will also be
appropriate to refer to paras 31 and 32 from the judgment of
88
this Court in Associate Builders [Associate Builders v. DDA,
(2015) 3 SCC 49 : (2015) 2 SCC (Civ) 204] , which read thus :
Section 14 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 73 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Manohar Lal Sharma vs The Principle Secretary & Others on 25 August, 2014
6. It was submitted by the learned Attorney General that after the
declaration of law and the conclusion that the allotment of coal
blocks was arbitrary and illegal, only two consequences flow from
the judgment [Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secy., (2014) 9
SCC 516] . The first is the natural consequence, that is, the
allotment of the coal blocks (other than those mentioned in the
judgment) should be cancelled and the Central Government is
fully prepared to take things forward. The second option is that
46 coal blocks (as above) be left undisturbed (subject to
conditions) and the allotment of the remaining coal blocks should
be cancelled.