Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.27 seconds)Section 12 in The M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Firm Ganeshram Harvilas And Anr. vs Ramchandra Rao on 30 January, 1970
In Firm Ganeshram Harvilas and
another Vs. Ramachandra Rao [1970 MPLJ 902] a Division
Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court had to consider the
effect of Section 12(3) and Section 13(2) of the Act. The
Division Bench has held, interalia, that every kind of
dispute as to the amount of rent payable by the tenant is
within the scope of Section 13(2) of the Act. This, in our
view, is too broad a proposition to merit acceptance. With
regard to the word thereafter in second part of sub-
section (1) of Section 13, the Division Bench rightly
concluded that it meant after one month of the service of
the writ of summons on the tenant, or, where time is
extended, after the time so extended under the first part
of sub-section (1).
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 193 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Jivrambhai And Anr. vs Amarsingh on 28 April, 1972
In Jivrambhai and another Vs.
Amarsingh [1972 MPLJ 785] the observation of the Division
Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court that as soon as the
dispute under Section 13(2) of the Act is raised and it is
brought to the notice of the Court the operation of Section
13(1) of the Act gets arrested so far as the amount to be
deposited in Court is concerned and it remains in suspense
until provisional rent is fixed, is also too wide a
statement to be correct.
1