Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.65 seconds)

M. Narayandas vs State Of Karnataka And Ors on 19 September, 2003

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the first respondent submitted that the offence under Section 4(1) of the said Act is a cognizable offence. Besides 341 IPC is also a cognizable offence and there is no bar under Law to investigate the offence under Section 188 IPC. What is prohibited is only for taking cognizance. Even if cognizance is taken, the entire proceedings shall not be vitiated in view of Section 460 Cr.P.c. Hence, it is submitted that the materials collected would clearly indicate that the offences under Sections 341, 143 and 188 of IPC read with Section 4(1) of the said Act 5/14 http://www.judis.nic.in CRL.O.P(MD)Nos.7758 of 2020 & 1512 of 2021 have been made out and therefore, charge sheet as against the petitioners cannot be quashed. Hence, prays for dismissal of these Criminal Original Petitions. In support of her submission, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) relied upon the judgment of the Apex court in M.Narayanadas Vs. State of Karnataka reported in (2003) 11 SCC 251.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 86 - S N Variava - Full Document
1   2 Next