Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.39 seconds)R. Thiruvirkolam vs The Presiding Officer & Anr on 18 November, 1996
The Supreme Court had subsequently, in Director, State Transport Punjab v. Gurdev Singh and Ors. 1998 (2) SCC 159 : 1998-II-LLJ-39 has reiterated the law laid down by Supreme Court in R. Thiruvirkolam case (supra).
Punjab Diary Development Corporation vs Kala Singh Etc on 7 May, 1997
9. All these cases were reconsidered by Supreme Court in Punjab Dairy Development Co Ltd., and Anr. v. Kala Singh AIR 1997 SC 2661 : 1997 (6) SCC 159 : 1997-II-LLJ-l041 and the Apex Court held that the judgment in Desraj Gupta case (vide supra), was not correct law.
Director, State Transport, Punjab And ... vs Gurdev Singh And Anr. on 4 November, 1997
The Supreme Court had subsequently, in Director, State Transport Punjab v. Gurdev Singh and Ors. 1998 (2) SCC 159 : 1998-II-LLJ-39 has reiterated the law laid down by Supreme Court in R. Thiruvirkolam case (supra).
Graphite India Ltd. And Another vs Durgapur Projects Ltd. And Others on 27 August, 1999
10. More so, in Graphite India, and Anr. v. Durgapur Project, Ltd. 1999 (7) SCC 645, the similar principle has been reiterated and it has been held that when an action is approved, it would relate back to date of action. The award of the Labour Court cannot be upheld.
The Management Of The Express ... vs The Presiding Officer,Labour Court, ... on 18 December, 1963
In support of his contention, Sri Parihar has placed reliance on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Ram Kumar Bairwa v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and Ors. 1989 (1) RLW 675, wherein after placing reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Express Newspaper (Private), Ltd., Madurai v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court Madurai, and Anr. AIR 1964 SC 806 : 1964-I-LLJ-9, it has been held that the services of the probationer cannot be terminated before expiry of the initial probation period. Terminating the services of the petitioner before completion of two years of probation period itself makes it evident that he has been discharged/terminated on the ground of misconduct.
Syed Azam Hussaini vs The Andhra Bank Ltd on 31 January, 1995
In Syed Azam Hussaini v. Andhra Bank Ltd. AIR 1995 SC 1352 : 1995 Suppl (1) SCC 557 : 1995-II-LLJ-126, the Apex Court has held that the services of the probationer should not be terminated during the period of probation or extended period of probation without showing sufficient cause.
Kunwar Arun Kumar vs U.P. Hill Electronic Corporation Ltd. & ... on 28 October, 1996
15. Sri Bhati, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Kunwar Arun Kumar v. Uttar Pradesh Hills Electronics Corporations, Ltd., and Ors. 1997 (2) SCC 191 : 1997-III-LLJ (suppl)-79l, wherein it has been held:
State Of Punjab vs Baldev Singh Khosla on 19 April, 1996
17. This issue has been considered by the Apex Court from time and again and it has consistently been held that a probationer can be terminated from service for "failure to satisfactorily completing the period of probation" the termination of services on the ground of unsatisfactory work cannot be termed as penal and does not require any enquiry, (vide State of Punjab v. Baldeo Singh Khosla AIR 1996 SC 2093 : 1996 (9) SCC 190.
K.V. Krishnamani vs Lalit Kala Academy on 10 May, 1996
In Krishnamani v. Lalit Kala Academy AIR 1996 SC 2444 : 1996 (5) SCC 89 : 1996-II-LLJ-661, the Supreme Court observed as under in 1996-II-LLJ-661 at 662.