Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.50 seconds)Section 137 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Chhattisgarh vs Punnu @ Praveen And Ors. 68 ... on 21 February, 2018
(i) A writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 17.09.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Court No. 3, Mau in Criminal Revision No. 119 of 2008 (Shiv Narayan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Another) as well as the impugned order dated 26.05.2008 passed by the learned City Magistrate, Mau in Case No. 5 of 2002 (State Vs. Smt Champa Singh and others) under Section 133 Cr.P.C.
Shiv Murti Singh (Dead) Son Of Sri Laxmi ... vs Secretary, U.P. Basic Shiksha ... on 12 January, 2007
(i) A writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 17.09.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Court No. 3, Mau in Criminal Revision No. 119 of 2008 (Shiv Narayan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Another) as well as the impugned order dated 26.05.2008 passed by the learned City Magistrate, Mau in Case No. 5 of 2002 (State Vs. Smt Champa Singh and others) under Section 133 Cr.P.C.
Shiv Narain Pandey And 4 Others vs Dr. Surya Kant Tripathi, Basic Shiksha ... on 23 January, 2020
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there was no any public pathway but the land was sold in favour of the petitioner by coloniser on his private land on which he fixed his gate and he did never make obstruction in the public way. It is also submitted that a civil suit was filed by the present petitioner as original suit no. 1680 of 2000 (Shiv Narayan Singh Vs. Surya Kumar) in which rights of the parties are to be decided by the learned civil court which is competent in this regard. Where civil suit was pending before the learned civil court, proceedings under Section 133 Cr.P.C. cannot be finalized but in view of Section 137 Criminal Procedure Code the learned City Magistrate may have stopped the proceedings of the case but passed the order finally. It is also submitted that the master plan was only mentioned in the police report but no any such master plan was produced before the learned court. It is also submitted that in the said civil suit though Champa Singh was not made a party but she filed an impleadment application which is still pending. In this way, being civil suit pending before the competent court regarding the determination of rights of the parties no order under Section 133 Cr.P.C. can be passed by the learned City Magistrate. In this way, the learned City Magistrate as well as the learned revisional court did not consider the material on record in proper way but passed the orders in question without application of judicial mind, therefore, request to set aside the orders passed by the learned City Magistrate and learned Revisional Court.
1