Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.23 seconds)Section 73 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 73 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
Section 75 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
M/S. Kailash Nath Associates vs Delhi Development Authority & Anr on 9 January, 2015
9.2 The Supreme Court in Kailash Nath Associates (supra) held:
Fateh Chand vs Balkishan Das on 15 January, 1963
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that from a reading of
the award dated 14.12.2017 it is evident that no amount in excess of
LD was awarded. Albeit, the PBG was held to be validly invoked but
there was no quantification of damages. It was contended that the
tribunal rejected the counter claim nos. 1 to 3 for failure of the
respondent to prove damages and yet illegally awarded damages under
Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for short „CA‟). Reliance
is placed on the decisions of the Supreme Court in Kailash Nath
Associates v. DDA, (2015) 4 SCC 136 and Fateh Chand v.
Balkishan Dass, 1963 SCC OnLine SC 49.