Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (0.22 seconds)

Smt. Maina Devi vs State Of U.P. on 27 September, 2013

28. Keeping in view the aforesaid settled proposition of law and the judgments rendered by this Court in the case of Smt. Maina Devi versus State of U.P. 2013(83) ACC 902 and Smt. Shanti Devi wife of Sri Ram versus State of U.P. 2007(2) ALJ 483 (All), and Rajbir Singh Tyagi Vs State of U.P. and Others 2018 SCC Online AII 5986, this Court is of the view that the Tractor, which was attached, were acquired by the petitioner herself with the aid of her earning from legal resources and not by commission of any offence triable under the Act as it is settled law that the properties being made subject matter of attachment under Section 14 of the Act must have been acquired by a gangster and that too by commission of an offence triable under the Act and also the impugned orders were not passed on reasons which are relevant and material.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 9 - R Singh - Full Document

Ram Sharan Maurya vs State Of U. P. on 18 November, 2020

28. Keeping in view the aforesaid settled proposition of law and the judgments rendered by this Court in the case of Smt. Maina Devi versus State of U.P. 2013(83) ACC 902 and Smt. Shanti Devi wife of Sri Ram versus State of U.P. 2007(2) ALJ 483 (All), and Rajbir Singh Tyagi Vs State of U.P. and Others 2018 SCC Online AII 5986, this Court is of the view that the Tractor, which was attached, were acquired by the petitioner herself with the aid of her earning from legal resources and not by commission of any offence triable under the Act as it is settled law that the properties being made subject matter of attachment under Section 14 of the Act must have been acquired by a gangster and that too by commission of an offence triable under the Act and also the impugned orders were not passed on reasons which are relevant and material.
Supreme Court of India Cites 42 - Cited by 77 - U U Lalit - Full Document
1   2 3 Next