Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.42 seconds)
Madanjit Kumar vs Central Electronics Limited on 10 February, 2026 cites

Jai Bhagwan vs Commr.Of Police & Ors on 5 July, 2013

33. The Supreme Court has recognized that the principle of proportionality requires the authority to demonstrate that the penalty rests on a rational evaluation of relevant considerations and exclusion of irrelevant ones, while also satisfying a requirement of necessity. The measure adopted 16 Jai Bhagwan v. Commissioner of Police (2013) 11 SCC 187; Dev Singh v. Punjab Tourism Development Corpn. Ltd. (2003) 8 SCC 9.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 53 - T S Thakur - Full Document

Dev Singh vs Punjab Tourism Development ... on 2 September, 2003

33. The Supreme Court has recognized that the principle of proportionality requires the authority to demonstrate that the penalty rests on a rational evaluation of relevant considerations and exclusion of irrelevant ones, while also satisfying a requirement of necessity. The measure adopted 16 Jai Bhagwan v. Commissioner of Police (2013) 11 SCC 187; Dev Singh v. Punjab Tourism Development Corpn. Ltd. (2003) 8 SCC 9.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 94 - Full Document

Management Of Coimbatore District ... vs Secretary, Coimbatore District ... on 23 April, 2007

38. The impugned orders are accordingly set aside to the limited extent they impose the penalty of removal from service. The matter is remitted to the competent authority to reconsider the penalty afresh. Such 17 Coimbatore District Central Cooperative Bank v. Coimbatore District Central Cooperative Bank Employees Assn. and Another, (2007) 4 SCC 669.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 79 - C K Thakker - Full Document
1   2 Next