Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.31 seconds)Section 147 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
New India Assurance Compafiy vs Shri Satpal Singh And Ors on 2 December, 1999
10. Having considered the rival contentions of both the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Supreme Court in New India Assurance Company v. Shri Satpal Singh (supra), after examining Section 95 of the old Act and also Section 147 of the new Act, and after considering its judgments in Pushbabai Parshottam Udeshi v. M/s. Ranjit Ginning and Pressing Company Private Limited, , and Mallavas case (supra) observed that under the new Act, an insurance policy covering third party risk is not required to exclude gratuitous passengers in a vehicle, no matter that the vehicle is of any type or class. Hence the decisions rendered under the old Act vis-a-vis gratuitous passengers are of no avail while considering the liability of the Insurance Company in respect of arty accident which occurred or would occur after the new Act came into force.
The Minimum Wages Act, 1948
Section 95 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. And Anr. vs Salapuriappa And Ors. on 23 February, 1996
10. Having considered the rival contentions of both the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Supreme Court in New India Assurance Company v. Shri Satpal Singh (supra), after examining Section 95 of the old Act and also Section 147 of the new Act, and after considering its judgments in Pushbabai Parshottam Udeshi v. M/s. Ranjit Ginning and Pressing Company Private Limited, , and Mallavas case (supra) observed that under the new Act, an insurance policy covering third party risk is not required to exclude gratuitous passengers in a vehicle, no matter that the vehicle is of any type or class. Hence the decisions rendered under the old Act vis-a-vis gratuitous passengers are of no avail while considering the liability of the Insurance Company in respect of arty accident which occurred or would occur after the new Act came into force.
Smt Mallawwa Etc vs Oriental Insurance Co, Ltd. And Ors on 27 November, 1998
9. He also drew my attention to the decision of the Apex Court in Mallawwa v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited,
, wherein the Apex Court ruled in respect of the passengers both gratuitous and fare paid, travelling in a goods vehicle. While considering the liability of the Insurance Company under the old Act, the Apex Court ruled that the Insurance Company is not liable to pay the compensation.
1