Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.25 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 341 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 34 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Rajasthan vs Smt. Kalki & Anr on 15 April, 1981
Recently, this difference was reiterated in Ganapathi v. State of Tamil
Nadu, (2018) 5 SCC 549, in the following terms, by referring to the three
Judge bench decision in State of Rajasthan v. Kalki (supra):
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Bharwada Bhoginbhai Hirjibhai vs State Of Gujarat on 24 May, 1983
XIII. A former statement though seemingly inconsistent with the evidence
need not necessarily be sufficient to amount to contradiction. Unless the
former statement has the potency to discredit the later statement, even if
the later statement is at variance with the former to some extent it would
not be helpful to contradict that witness." [See Bharwada Bhoginbhai
Hirjibhai v. State of Gujarat 1983 Cri LJ 1096 : (AIR 1983 SC 753) Leela
Ram v. State of Haryana AIR 1995 SC 3717 and Tahsildar Singh v. State
of UP (AIR 1959 SC 1012)]
Abdul Sayeed vs State Of M.P on 14 September, 2010
This Court is further fortified in this view by the Judgment
of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India titled as 'Abdul Sayeed v. State of
Madhya Pradesh' dated 14.09.2010, Crl.