Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.26 seconds)

Manoharlal Gopilal Pande vs Dr. Abdul Mazid Khan on 26 June, 1996

In view of the aforesaid decision of the Apex Court governing the field of the involved question, the case law of this court cited on behalf of the appellant in the matter of Gurbachansingh Vs. Vimlabai-AIR 1993 MP 135 and in the matter of ManoharLal GopiLal Pande Vs. Dr. Abdul Mazid Khan- 1997(1) MPLJ-232 are not helping them because the cited cases were decided by this court 13 long before giving the interpretation to section 13 of M.P. Accommodation Control Act,1961 by the Apex Court in the matter of Jamnalal (supra). In the aforesaid premises, I have not found any circumstance or substance in this appeal giving rise to any question of law rather than substantial question of law assailing the decree passed under section 12(1)(a) of the Act or to consider any question for condoning the delay in depositing the rent under section 13 of the Act.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Jamnalal & Ors vs Radheshyam on 18 April, 2000

In view of the aforesaid decision of the Apex Court governing the field of the involved question, the case law of this court cited on behalf of the appellant in the matter of Gurbachansingh Vs. Vimlabai-AIR 1993 MP 135 and in the matter of ManoharLal GopiLal Pande Vs. Dr. Abdul Mazid Khan- 1997(1) MPLJ-232 are not helping them because the cited cases were decided by this court 13 long before giving the interpretation to section 13 of M.P. Accommodation Control Act,1961 by the Apex Court in the matter of Jamnalal (supra). In the aforesaid premises, I have not found any circumstance or substance in this appeal giving rise to any question of law rather than substantial question of law assailing the decree passed under section 12(1)(a) of the Act or to consider any question for condoning the delay in depositing the rent under section 13 of the Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 43 - S S Quadri - Full Document
1   2 Next