Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.83 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Nagappa vs Gurudayal Singh & Ors on 3 December, 2002
(1) Nagappa Vs. Gurudayal Singh and Others10, at para 21 of the
judgment, that -
Section 110 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 168 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 110 in Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 [Entire Act]
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Gujarat Ship Trading Corporation on 30 June, 1997
9. The simple reading of Section 2(34) of the Motor Vehicle Act,
1988 would imply that if public have a right of access though on
private land, it could be public place within the meaning of Section 2
(34) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988. The issue is no more res integra
as this Court in case of United India Insurance Company Limited
vs. Gujarat Ship Trade Corporation and others - 1997 (3) GLR
2560, addressed this issue. Relevant paras thereof are as under:
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Devchandbhai Khumansinh Ajanar on 11 March, 2020
30. The New India Assurance Company Limited vs. Devchandbhai
Khumansinh Ajanar (1 supra) was a case of a minor son of the claimants was
sleeping by covering a plastic cover in an open place of the factory and while
reversing a tractor in the premises the accident has occurred and minor son of
the claimants died. The defense was similar to that of the present case that the
place is not a public place and within the four corners of the compound of the
12
factory which is the private place. In the said context, the above observations are
made by the Hon‟ble High Court of Gujarat.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Mohd. Nasir & Anr on 12 May, 2009
The principle was followed in the later decisions in Oriental Insurance
Co. Ltd. v. Mohd. Nasir [(2009) 6 SCC 280 : (2009) 2 SCC (Civ) 877 :