Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.21 seconds)
Dinesh Ghanshamdas Gurnani vs M/O Urban Development on 10 April, 2023 cites

Union Of India & Ors vs J. Ahmed on 7 March, 1979

(il). Union of India and others Vs... Ahmed, reported in AIR 1979 SC 1022 dealing with the aspect of negligence and misconduct, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that "There may be negligence in performance of duty or error of judgment in evaluating the developing situation, may be negligence in discharge of duties but would not constitute misconduct." In the entire proceedings, dishonesty or deliberate negligence on the part of the applicant has not been proved. Therefore, this judgment is applicable in the present case, (HH). Kameshwar Prasad Shreevastava \s.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 473 - D A Desai - Full Document

Sher Bahadur vs Union Of India & Ors on 16 August, 2002

A.¥8. The applicant submits that all the above-mentioned parameters are absent from the present proceedings.He further submits that the administration has miserably failed to 20 OA No.655/2017 show any nexus between person obtaining allotment of Goverment quarters fraudently and the applicant. He again relied upon the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 16.08.2002 in the case of Sher Bahadur Vs. Union of India in Appeal (Civil) No.5055/2002 and held that "it may be observed that the expression "suificlency of evidence" postulates existence of some evidence which links the charged officer with the misconduct alleged against him. Evidence, however voluminous if may &8, which Is neither relevant in a broad | sense or establishes any nexus between the alleged miscanduct and the charged officer is not evidence in law. "Therefore, this DA should be allowed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 129 - Full Document
1