Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.30 seconds)

M.S. Madhava Rao And Ors. vs D.V.K. Surya Rao, Member Of The ... on 2 April, 1953

It was urged on behalf of the petitioner that R. 26 was limited in its application to disputes regarding or concerning the business of a co-operative society as set out in the bye-laws as the objects of the society and that the election of the Chairman of the Board of Directors was not within the scope of business of the Society as defined in the Act or in the bye-laws. The respondents, however, contended that the meaning of the words business of a co-operative society' was enlarged by the use of the word 'touching' and, therefore, the disputes which could be referred to the Registrar under rule 20 were not restricted to matters properly arising from and out of the business of the society but also covered matters concerning the internal management of the society and its constitution. The respondents commended to us for acceptance of the view taken by the Madras High Court in Madhaya Rao v. Surya Rao, AIR 1954 Mad 103 (FB), in construing a somewhat similar provision, namely, Section 51 (1) of the Madras Co-operative Societies Act, 1932,
Madras High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 46 - Full Document
1   2 Next