Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.62 seconds)Section 328 in The Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 [Entire Act]
Tata Cellular vs Union Of India on 26 July, 1994
24] In the case of Tata Cellular v. Union of India5, the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the context of judicial review at paragraph 77 has
observed thus:
M/S. Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 23 March, 2012
25] In the case of Heinz India Private Limited & Anr. vs. State
of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.6 the Hon'ble Supreme has held that there
is almost complete unanimity on the principle that the judicial review
is not so much concerned with the decision itself as much with the
6 (2012) 5 SCC 443
22/26
::: Uploaded on - 22/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 23/03/2016 00:01:50 :::
skc JUDGMENT- WP 2448-2007
decision-making process.
Union Of India And Anr vs S.B. Vohra And Ors on 5 January, 2004
Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd on 2 April, 2002
respondents in the purported exercise of powers conferred by
sections 328 and 328-A of the said Act. This court, by judgment and
order dated 8 October 2002, mainly relying upon the decision of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Municipal
Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Bharat Petroleum
Corporation Ltd.1, had dismissed the said petition. The petitioners,
thereupon instituted civil appeal no. 4678 of 2005, which was since
disposed of by the judgment and order dated 4 August 2005.