Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.51 seconds)
Jagdishbhai Maganbhai Vasava vs State Of Gujarat on 2 July, 2019 cites

Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors on 12 November, 2013

3. The Police Inspector, Rajpipla Town Police Station, Narmada, is directed to take into consideration the complaint filed by the petitioner in writing and after going through the same, take a decision, whether the same discloses commission of a Page 1 of 3 Downloaded on : Wed Jul 10 00:34:22 IST 2019 R/SCR.A/5287/2018 ORDER cognizable offence or not. Police authority shall follow the directions issued by Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr., 2014(2) SCC 1 as well as in the case of State of Telangana V/s. Habib Abdullah Jeelani and others,(2017) 2 SCC 779. After taking into consideration the complaint and other materials, if any, the Police Inspector is of the view that the same discloses commission of a cognizable offence, then appropriate directions be issued for registration of the FIR forthwith at the concerned Police Station. However, the Police Inspector, after going through the materials, is of the view that no case is made out for registration of the FIR, then in such circumstances, he shall inform the petitioner in writing about the same by assigning reasons in brief, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the writ of this Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 71 - Cited by 18813 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1