Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)
Shri Shankarlal Gilada And Ors. vs Kapricon Sleepers Works Pvt. Ltd. And ... on 10 February, 2005
cites
S.S. Laxminarayanan And Anr. vs Mather And Platt India Ltd. And Ors. on 17 July, 1997
The learned counsel relied on the case law reported in (1997) 13 Supreme Court page 2 to 9 in the case of S. S. Lakshmi Narayan V. Platt India Ltd. The petition is also not maintainable in the absence of averments in terms of Section 397(2)(b) of the Companies act, that the facts justify making of an order of winding up on just and equitable grounds, but winding up would unfairly prejudice the interest of the petitioner.
Rajahmundry Electric ... vs A. Nageswara Rao And Others on 16 December, 1955
There is no deadlock in the company and there is no justification for making of an order for winding up. The learned counsel relied on the case law -Rajahmundry Electric Supply Corp. Ltd v. A. Nageshwara Rao and Ors., AIR 1956 Supreme Court 213) - Hanuman Prasad Bagri v. Bagree Cereals Pvt. Ltd., (2001) 105 CC 493 (Supreme Court). In Ref. Bengal Luxmi Cotton Mills Limited, (1965) 35 Company Cases page 198.
Hanuman Prasad Bagri & Ors vs Bagress Cereals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors on 27 March, 2001
There is no deadlock in the company and there is no justification for making of an order for winding up. The learned counsel relied on the case law -Rajahmundry Electric Supply Corp. Ltd v. A. Nageshwara Rao and Ors., AIR 1956 Supreme Court 213) - Hanuman Prasad Bagri v. Bagree Cereals Pvt. Ltd., (2001) 105 CC 493 (Supreme Court). In Ref. Bengal Luxmi Cotton Mills Limited, (1965) 35 Company Cases page 198.
Section 397 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
1