Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)Section 120A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Passports Act, 1967
Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar vs State Of Maharashtra(And Connected ... on 18 March, 1963
The evidentiary value of the said act is limited by two
circumstances namely the acts shall in reference to the common intention and in respect
of the period after such intention was entertained by anyone of them. The expression in
reference to your common intention is very comprehensive and appears to have been
designedly used to give it a wider scope than the words in furtherance of. In English law
with the result, anything said, done or written by co conspirators the conspiracy was
formed, will be evidence against the other before he entered the field of conspiracy or
FIR NO.: 119 OF 2007
POLICE STATION: IGI AIRPORT
U/S: 420/468/471/120 B IPC & 12 PASSPORT ACT 11 of 14
after he left it. Another important limitation implicit in the language is indication by the
expressed scope of its relevancy. Anything so said, done or written is a relevant fact as
against each of the persons believed to be so conspiry as well as for the purpose of
proving the existence of conspiracy as for the purpose of showing that any such person
was a party to it." as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Sardar Sardul
Singh Caveeshar Vs State of Maharashtra (And Connected Appeals) dated 18.03.1963.
Section 10 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
1