Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.18 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Banwari Lal vs The State Of Rajasthan on 5 November, 1996
In a decision reported in 1979(1) Cr.Law Journal page-161 (Banwari and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan) the Importance of prompt preparation of inquest report has been highlighted and in paragraph-11 of the judgment it has been held as follows:
Mahabir Pershad Singh And Anr. vs Ram Narain Koer And Ors. And The ... on 9 June, 1886
Similarly, in another decision reported in 1979 (2) Criminal Law Journal page-1159 (Mahabir Singh and Anr. v. State), this question has been discussed and in paragraph-49 of the judgment it has been held as follows:
Gurdeo Singh And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 September, 1994
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-appellants placing reliance on Gurdeo Singh v. State (1963) 65 Pun LR 409 rightly urged that the inquest report is a document of vital importance and has to be prepared promptly because it has to be handed over to the doctor along with the dead body to be sent for post-mortem examination. If the facts about the occurrence are mentioned in the inquest report, it would go to show that by that time the true version of the occurrence had been given therein. If, however, the facts of the incident are not mentioned in the inquest report, the argument that till that time the investigating officer, who had prepared the inquest report, was not definite about the factual position cannot be deemed to be devoid of force.
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Shankarlal Gyarasilal Dixit vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 December, 1980
In this connection I may refer some of the observations made by the Supreme Court in a case of Shankarlal Gyarasilal Dixit v. State of Maharashtra which reads as follows:
1