Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.30 seconds)Section 65 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 96 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 47 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Kancherla Lakshminarayana vs Mattaparthi Syamala & Ors on 14 March, 2008
16. Yet again the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Kancherla Lakshminarayana Vs Mattaparthi
Shyamala and others reported in AIR 2008 SC
21
2069 has held an attachment cannot be free from
prior obligations and necessary sequatar is that
after the factum of sale the objection would still lie
before the sale is made absolute. In the said
judgment it has been held as under:
Section 2 in The Amending Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
The Amending Act, 1897
Bollapalli Venkat Rao vs Chaturvedula Subbaiah And Anr. on 26 July, 1982
In this context the
Judgment of High Court of Andhra Pradesh in the
case of Bollapalli Venkat Rao Vs Chaturvedula
Subbaiah and another reported in AIR 1983 AP 166
is extracted to support my view.