Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (2.75 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Satya Devi vs Kanta Rani And Ors. on 22 December, 1998
8. In the present case as noticed above, the case of the plaintiff
himself is that Gurjit Singh and Baljit Singh are the same person and are entitled
PRADEEP KUMAR ARORA
2014.11.26 10:40
I attest to the accuracy and integrity
to specific share in the property of the family. The plaintiff has been examined
of this document
Punjab and Haryana High Court,
Chandigarh
Civil Revision No.6202 of 2014(O&M) -4-
and it was for the petitioner/defendant to cross examine the said witness
regarding this aspect. The provisions of Order 11 of the CPC cannot be used
for the purpose of filling up the lacuna in cross examination if any. This Court in
Satya Devi Vs. Kanta Rani 1999(3) PLR 724 set aside the order vide which the
trial Court which had allowed the application for interrogatories on the ground
that entire evidence of the parties had been led and the case was listed for
evidence of the plaintiff in rebuttal and the very purpose of interrogatories at
that stage was frustrated and the order passed was without jurisdiction. The
relevant observations read as under:-
1