Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 33 (0.92 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 49 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 17 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 53 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 49 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Jupudi Kesava Rao vs Pulavarthi Venkata Subbarao And Others on 29 January, 1971
19.In Jupudi Kesava Rao's case, sated supra, the Hon'ble Supreme Court,
referring to Sections 35 and 36 of the Stamp Act, held that, though, once the
time for raising objection to admission of documentary evidence is passed and
no objections based on the same ground can be raised at a later stage, it would
not extend the applicability of Section 36 to secondary evidence adduced or
sought to be adduced in proof of contents of a document which is unstamped or
insufficiently stamped.
Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs Union Of India on 27 July, 2022
21.In Vijay's case, stated supra, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that if a
10/20
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 19/09/2025 08:10:50 pm )
document, that is required to be stamped, is not sufficiently stamped, then a
copy of such document cannot be admitted as secondary evidence. However, on
facts, the Hon'ble Supreme Court found that the document in question did not
attract any stamp duty and permitted the prayer for leading secondary evidence.
Avinash Kumar Chauhan vs Vijay Krishna Mishra on 17 December, 2008
23.In Avinash Kumar Chauhan's case, stated supra, the Hon'ble Supreme
Court held that an unregistered deed of sale on which adequate stamp duty was
not paid cannot be admitted for any purpose whatsoever, including collateral
purposes.