Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.41 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 324 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 84 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 326 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sheralli Wali Mohammed vs The State Of Maharashtra on 9 August, 1972
59) The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sheralli Wali
Mohammed vs. the State of Maharashtra6 dealing with the
appeal filed by the appellant against the concurrent findings of
the Sessions Court as well as the High Court in convicting and
sentencing the accused under Section 302 of I.P.C. and dealing
with the plea of insanity disbelieved the case of the appellant
that he was suffering with mental disorder at the time of
offence.
Fireman Ghulam Mustafa vs State Of Uttaranchal(Now Uttarakhand) on 25 August, 2015
Under the
circumstances, even the case Fireman Ghulam Mustafa (5
supra) is of no use to the present case.
State Of Punjab vs Hakam Singh on 31 August, 2005
49) Another decision in Hakam Singh's case (4 supra)
has nothing to do with the allegations under Section 307 of
I.P.C. In fact, in the above said decision, the conviction under
Section 307 of I.P.C. was upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
In fact, it is misquoted to the present situation.
Surju Marandi And Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 23 February, 1977
56) Turning to the decision in Sarju Marandi's case (1
supra), the Patna High Court dealing with the case on hand and
looking into the defence of the accused that he was not sane at
the time of offence took into consideration of the fact that the
second appellant who was alleged to have committed the
murder of the deceased was present in the house all through in
the night from which the dead body of the deceased was
43
recovered. The Patna High Court took into consideration of fact
that the accused was of unsound mind at the time of occurrence
and even none of the family members dare to live with him.