Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.25 seconds)
Hazara Bai & Ors. vs Abdul Karim on 28 November, 2022 cites

Sheodan Singh vs Smt. Daryao Kunwar on 14 January, 1966

"3. Another argument is also advanced by the counsel of the contesting respondents on the preliminary objection. Before the lower appellate court there were two appeals, one by the fourth defendant and the other by the second defendant; and there were also two decrees, though the litigation started in one suit. The Official Receiver has filed only one second appeal against the decision in the appeal by the second defendant. The objection is that the Official Receiver cannot impugn both the decrees in one second appeal. In this contention also the counsel is not on firm ground, because the law is that if two appeals have been filed by two parties in a litigation arising out of one suit, one second appeal alone need be filed against both the decisions. We shall remain content by citing the latest decision of the Supreme Court on the question; vide Sheodan Singh v. Daryao Kunwar, AIR 1966 SC 1332.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 300 - K N Wanchoo - Full Document

Phoolchand And Anr vs Gopal Lal on 10 March, 1967

"8. Sections 96 and 100 of the CPC make provision for an appeal being preferred from every original decree or from every decree passed in appeal respectively; none of the provisions enumerates the person who can file an appeal. However, it is settled by a long catena of decisions that to be entitled to file an appeal the person must be one aggrieved by the decree. Unless a person is prejudicially or adversely affected by the decree he is not entitled to file an appeal. See Phoolchand and another v. Gopal Lal, 1967 (3) SCR 153; Smt. Jatan Kanwar Golcha v. M/s. Golcha Properties (P.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 165 - K N Wanchoo - Full Document
1   2 Next