Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.40 seconds)Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Rangappa vs Sri Mohan on 7 May, 2010
In Rangappa Vs. Sri Mohan4, the Supreme Court has
held that the accused can discharge the burden under Section 139 of
the NI Act by preponderance of probability. In this case, the accused
has demonstrated to the appellate Court that the account statement
filed by the complainant themselves does not support the cheque
amount.
Arulvelu & Anr vs State Rep By Public Prosecutor & Anr on 7 October, 2009
In this context, it may be relevant to refer to the
judgment of the Supreme Court in Arulvelu and another Vs. State
represented by the Public Prosecutor and another5, wherein, in
paragraph no.36, it is held as follows:
Section 20 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State Of Maharashtra Th:Cbi Mumbai on 21 March, 2013
13. At this juncture, it is necessary to state here that an
appeal is continuation of trial, as held by the Supreme Court in
Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra1, the
portion of which reads as under: