Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 46 (0.41 seconds)Section 409 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Article 20 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 403 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The State Of Bombay vs S. L. Apte & Another on 9 December, 1960
In The State of Bombay v. S.L. Apte and
Anr. AIR 1961 SC 578, the Constitution Bench
of this Court while dealing with the issue of
double jeopardy under Article 20(2), held:
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Leo Roy Frey vs The Superintendent, District ... on 31 October, 1957
In Leo Roy Frey v. Superintendent, District
Jail, Amritsar & Anr., AIR 1958 SC 119,
proceedings were taken against certain persons
in the first instance before the Customs
Authorities under Section 167(8) of the Sea
Customs Act and heavy personal penalties were
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24848 of 2014 46
imposed on them. Thereafter, they were
charged for an offence under Section 120- B
IPC. This Court held that an offence under
Section 120-B is not the same offence as that
under the Sea Customs Act:
Section 300 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 71 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Om Prakash Gupta vs State Of U. P.(With Connected Appeals) on 11 January, 1957
In Om Prakash Gupta v. State of U.P., AIR
1957 SC 458; and State of Madhya Pradesh v.
Veereshwar Rao Agnihotri, AIR 1957 SC 592,
this Court has held that prosecution and
conviction or acquittal under Section 409 IPC
do not debar trial of the accused on a charge
under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1947 because the two offences
are not identical in sense, import and content.