Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.27 seconds)The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 2 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Kailash vs Nanhku & Ors on 6 April, 2005
In view of the fact that the Supreme Court in the afore-
mentioned case has categorically held that the period of limitation as
provided under Section 34(3) of the Act of 1996 cannot be extended
by the Court beyond the time frame set out therein, I see no reason
why this Court should look into the judgment rendered in the case of
Kailash vs. Nanhku and others (supra).
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 14 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
State Of Goa vs M/S. Western Builders on 5 July, 2006
It has been held in case
of State of Goa (supra) that "under Section 34 by virtue of sub-
section (3) only the application for filing and setting aside the
award, a period has been prescribed as three months and delay
can be condoned to the extent of 30 days and to this extent the
applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act will stand
excluded but there is no provision in the Act of 1996 which
excludes operation of Section 14 of the Limitation Act."