Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.18 seconds)Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 294 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 354 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Kans Raj vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 26 April, 2000
(5) The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Kans Raj (supra) has
observed that a tendency has developed for roping in all relations of the
husband on the part of the wife. Mere naming them in the FIR is not enough to
summon them in the absence of any specific role and material to support such
role.
Rakesh Kumar Sharma And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Anr. on 21 May, 2004
On the influence of the
father and brother of complainant, Police has registered the impugned FIR
Signature Not Verified
against petitioners. It is further contended by learned Senior counsel that
Signed by: MAHENDRA
BARIK
Signing time: 5/10/2023
6:11:15 PM
4
proceedings against the petitioners are if allowed to continue, then it would be a
sheer abuse of process of law and it would cause harassment and torture to the
petitioners without any fault on their parts. It is further contended that now-a-
days, a tendency is increasing day-by-day of falsely implicating near and dear
relatives of husband so as to pressurize them. So far as offence under Section
498-A of IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act is concerned, the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the matter of Rajesh Sharma and others vs. State of UP and
Another decided on 27-07-2017 (CRA No. 1265 of 2017) has judicially
acknowledged the misuse of provisions of aforesaid Section 498-A of IPC and
Dowry Prohibition Act.
1