Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.23 seconds)
Samiranbasak vs The State Of West Bengal on 2 July, 2019 cites

Hira Lal And Ors vs State (Govt. Of Nct) Delhi on 25 July, 2003

36. The evidence of PW 1 and 4 do not prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim girl was subjected to such creulty that immediately drove her to kill herself. Such cruelty must exist immediately prior to and proxmiate to the death of the victim. There is no clear evidence in 18 this regard. Refrence in this regard is made to the case of Hira Lal Vs State (NCT of Delhi) reported in (2003) 8 SCC Pg 80. At paragraphs 8 and 9 it was laid down as follows :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 258 - A Pasayat - Full Document

State Of W.B vs Orilal Jaiswal on 23 September, 1993

In State of W.B. v. Orilal Jaiswal [(1994) 1 SCC 73 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 107] this Court has cautioned that the court should be extremely careful in assessing the facts and circumstances of each case and the evidence adduced in the trial for the purpose of finding whether the cruelty meted out to the victim had in fact induced her to end the life by committing suicide. If it appears to the court that a victim committing suicide was hypersensitive to ordinary petulance, discord and differences in domestic life quite common to the society to which the victim belonged and such petulance, discord and differences were not expected to induce a similarly circumstanced individual in a given society to commit suicide, the conscience of the court should not be satisfied for basing a finding that the accused charged of abetting the offence of suicide should be found guilty.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 456 - G N Ray - Full Document
1   2 3 Next