Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.49 seconds)

Income-Tax Officer, Gudur And Anr. vs Maramreddy Sulochanamma on 7 August, 1970

The petitioner was, therefore, not the sole residuary heir either. Viewed from any angle the petitioner was not the sole legal representative and that should have been patent even to the GTO. The GTO is, therefore, prohibited by a writ of mandamus from taking further proceedings in pursuance of impugned notice. - ITO v. Muramreddy Sulochanamma (1967) 64 ITR 106 (AP) Applied; Addl.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 9 - K S Hegde - Full Document
1   2 Next